The Zweites Buch (Second Book) is an unedited transcript of Adolf Hitler’s thoughts on foreign policy written in 1928; it was written after Mein Kampf and was not published in his lifetime.
The Zweites Buch was not published in 1928 because Mein Kampf did not sell well at that time and Hitler’s publisher, Franz-Eher-Verlag, told Hitler that a second book would hinder sales even more.
War and Peace
The Necessity of Strife
Race and Will in the Struggle for Power
Elements of Foreign Policy
National Socialist Foreign Policy
German Needs and Aims
Policies of the Second Reich
Military Power and Fallacy of Border Restoration as Goal
Hopelessness of an Economic Situation
On Necessity for an Active Foreign Policy
Germany and Russia
German Foreign Policy
England as an Ally
Italy as an Ally
Zweites Buch & Mein Kampf
There are a number of similarities and differences between Zweites Buch and Mein Kampf. As in Mein Kampf, Hitler declared that the Jews were his eternal and most dangerous opponents. As in Mein Kampf, Hitler outlined what the German historian Andreas Hillgruber has called his Stufenplan (“stage-by-stage plan”).
Hitler himself never used the term Stufenplan, which was coined by Hillgruber in his 1965 book Hitlers Strategie. Briefly, the Stufenplan called for three stages.
In the first stage, there would be a massive military build-up, the overthrow of the “shackles” of the Treaty of Versailles, and the forming of alliances with Fascist Italy and the British Empire.
The second stage would be a series of fast, “lightning wars” in conjunction with Italy and Britain against France and whichever of her allies in Eastern Europe—such as Czechoslovakia, Poland, Romania and Yugoslavia—chose to stand by her. The third stage would be a war to obliterate what Hitler considered to be the “Judeo-Bolshevik” regime in the Soviet Union.
In contrast to Mein Kampf, in Zweites Buch Hitler added a fourth stage to the Stufenplan. He insinuated that in the far future a struggle for world domination might take place between the United States and a European alliance comprising a “new association of nations, consisting of individual states with high national value”.
Zweites Buch also offers a different perspective on the U.S. than that outlined in Mein Kampf. In the latter, Hitler declared that Germany’s most dangerous opponent on the international scene was the Soviet Union; in Zweites Buch, Hitler declared that for immediate purposes, the Soviet Union was still the most dangerous opponent, but that in the long-term, the most dangerous potential opponent was the U.S.
In the first two chapters Hitler proclaimed the conquest of habitat as the main subject of the Nazi movement and gives it a far-reaching statement of reasons.
The starting point of his considerations is the “struggle for daily bread” as the basis of human society. From this he developed his central idea of the correspondence between the population and the size of the habitat of a people. Is this out of proportion, so is degeneration and a decline of a nation. The struggle for adequate habitat he rises to a central principle of human history. This fight can be fought only militarily for Hitler.
As alternatives to the struggle for living space he sees birth control to reduce emigration to the population, the increase in food production and exports to buy food to. All of these alternatives he rejects hereafter. Birth control and emigration he rejects as a weakening of the people. The increase of food production he declared insufficiently feasible. Export it discards because it leads to increased struggle for markets with other nations, and therefore could only lead to the situation in which Germany stood 1914th On these considerations Hitler comes back in the other chapters and repeated it several times.
In the other chapters Hitler developed his thoughts on the future National Socialist foreign policy that serves the struggle for living space. As in Mein Kampf explains Hitler in the Second Book, the Jews to the German people and its eternal and most dangerous opponents and outlining his future political plans.
In Mein Kampf Hitler had the USA mentioned only occasionally and even with contempt. They were to him as “racially degenerate” society that contrary see the demise. By contrast, Hitler describes in this book the United States as a dynamic, “racially successful” society that eugenics and racial segregation practiced and an exemplary immigration policy at the expense of “inferior” immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe.
Whence this change may stir in Hitler’s attitude 1924-1928, is unknown. Historians have noted that Hitler notoriously poorly informed about the world outside of Germany and at times the writing of Mein Kampf probably knew little about the United States. Hitler’s knowledge of America came especially from the Western novels of Karl May based which he read. This seems to have changed to 1928; Hitler will have heard of prosperity and industrialization in the United States as well as by the Immigration Act of 1924, the racial segregation and the fact that several states had the forced sterilization concept passed on supposedly mentally retarded people. Hitler stated his admiration for such measures as well as his wish that Germany should adopt similar policies on a larger scale.
Hitler stated that the National Socialist foreign policy was to be based on Lebensraum for the German people:
The National Socialist Movement, on the contrary, will always let its foreign policy be determined by the necessity to secure the space necessary to the life of our Folk. It knows no Germanising or Teutonising, as in the case of the national bourgeoisie, but only the spread of its own Folk. It will never see in the subjugated, so called Germanised, Czechs or Poles a national, let alone Folkish, strengthening, but only the racial weakening of our Folk.
Ideas on International Relations
Of all Germany’s potential enemies, Hitler ranked the U.S. as the most dangerous. By contrast, Hitler saw the UK as a fellow “Aryan” power that in exchange for Germany’s renunciation of naval and colonial ambitions would ally itself with Germany. France, in Hitler’s opinion, was rapidly “Negroizing” itself. In regard to the Soviet Union, Hitler dismissed the Russian people as being Slavic Untermenschen (“sub-humans”) incapable of intelligent thought.
Hitler consequently believed that the Russian people were ruled over by what he regarded as a gang of bloodthirsty but inept Jewish revolutionaries. The majority of Americans were in Hitler’s view “Aryans”, albeit Aryans ruled by what Hitler saw as a Jewish plutocracy. In Hitler’s point of view, it was this combination of “Aryan” might, coupled with a more competent “Jewish rule” which made the U.S. so dangerous.
In Zweites Buch, Hitler called for an Anglo-German alliance based on political expediency as well as the notion that the two Germanic powers were natural allies.
In Zweites Buch, Hitler argued that the alleged British striving for a balance of power leading to an Anglo-German alliance would not conflict with his goal of Germany being the dominant continental power because it was wrong to believe that “England fought every hegemonic power immediately”, but rather was prepared to accept dominant states whose aims were “obviously and purely continental in nature”.
Hitler went on to write that “Of course no one in Britain will conclude an alliance for the good of Germany, but only in the furtherance of British interests.”
Nonetheless, because Hitler believed that there was an ongoing struggle between the “Jewish invasion” and the “old British tradition” for the control of Britain, Hitler believed the chances for Anglo-German alliance to be good provided the “Jewish invasion” was resisted successfully.
Hitler hedged somewhat, however, by claiming that
“The instincts of Anglo-Saxondom are still so sharp and alive that one cannot speak of a complete victory of Jewry, but rather, in part the latter is still forced to adjust its interests to those of the English. If the Jew were to triumph in England, English interests would recede into the background…. [But] if the Briton triumphs then a shift of England’s attitude vis-à-vis Germany can still take place.”